Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Google

In this Discussion

Request for a new model design...
  • Alex_xxx
    Posts: 408
    The mgx is one of my favs due to its shape and movement. But I would really like to se a model with a wider and longer bottom part of the hourglass shape.

    Why?
    Well when we contract sucking the model in we usually have to push it back out. A broader base woul make it slip back out easier and more naturally and with less effort. Thereby allowing us to only focus on the contraction bit.

    Please take this into consideration..... :)
  • Aneros2Aneros2
    Posts: 35
    @Alex_xxx

    I'll copy and paste this link and send it to CT! 
    :)
  • Coincidentally I was just looking at the MGX as my next purchase with the 20percent discount. I have the eupho syn, the progasm and the junior which all have a similar form-factor, curved with bulbous larger head. The eupho has that notch at the bottom which I assume nestles between the two sphincter muscles and provides stability. I like the look of the MGX with the ridges at the base and want to experience the narrower and straighter head.

    Alex-xxx, i don't know what you mean about changing the design, do you mean by a broader base something like the progasm? I haven't tried the MGX design yet but look forward to it.
  • Alex_xxx
    Posts: 408
    Not a broader base in the middle of the hourglass shape, more like only a wider and a bit longer bottom part. Because when you contract you suck it in. And if the bottom part was wider and longer it would naturally slip back out  when you relax. Then you could concentrate on only the contractions and get more natural movement.

    U c?
  • I see. Brilliant.
  • Alex_xxx
    Posts: 408
    brilliant indeed @euphemistic

    All in favour say AYE!?
  • I like both ideas.
  • I wonder if the aneros company is looking for beta testers? LOL I volunteer.
  • Alex_xxx
    Posts: 408
    Me to :)
  • Auroken
    Posts: 81
    me three
  • I think I understand what you're talking about: something with a natural tendency to push itself back down the anal canal. I am with you on that. I'm a huge fan of the HFWO (even after having super Os  :D) and the key to having those is the ability to "catch and release" the toy.
  • Alex_xxx
    Posts: 408
    thats right @deepinfocus, it would become a new best seller, no doubt in my mind. the p-tab just isnt enough to drive outwards movement.

    the body response is to suck it inwards when getting excited so the model would need this to more naturally push it a bit out again.
  • my mind has been blown.. im actually able to think about how it would feel, give me goose pimples.  one that fights back would cause massive spasms,  kind of like the kegal balls for women.. adding the unconscious body response, if its has the tingle sensation of pushing out your body would try and suck it in giving new meaning to the let go faze.
  • i found the shape......    |><==O ... lol looks wierd but if you think about it, it would work.. it would cause it to push out and suck in at the same time allowing both functions to work perfectly..atleast i assume
  • Alex-xxx, I think you should get some recognition for this concept, if you haven't already patented it I mean. Maybe a percentage or naming rights for instance. Now if it only had electrostim...
  • Alex_xxx
    Posts: 408
    I've already made a polymorph prototype and it works :) now.. placing an order for a few thousand in china.. patent application on itsvway..