Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Google

In this Discussion

P-tab ON scrotum?
  • Hey Everybody, 23 year-old dude here. I've been using my MGX for 2 years. Felt some good stuff, although no super-O's yet. Tonight while having a session, I tried stretching my scrotum a bit so that part of it was actually underneath the P-tab, effectively holding the P-tab in place. I noticed almost immediately that I started having better sensations, and what seemed like better mobility of the Aneros. I've suspected for a while that the MGX might actually be overshooting my prostate a bit, which would make sense since I'm 5 foot 3, so smaller than most other guys. I was wondering if anyone else had a similar situation with the P-tab and the scrotum, and if it added anything to their sessions. Also, if any shorter guys have any advice, it would be appreciated. Thanks :D ~AJ
  • slimjm
    Posts: 497
    I caught the bottom of my scrotum under the P-tab once. Was uncomfortable particularly when the contractions came that pulled the massager inward thus pinching the scrotal skin. But I'm taller and your observation for shorter guys, presumably likewise with shorter internal distances to their prostate, seems valid. It may be a consideration in that case to choose a different model that has a shorter insertion length, perhaps such as the SGX, or to try modifying the P-tab (I've never done that but there are discussions on the forum how others have) to bring it closer to your perineum.
  • rookrook
    Posts: 1,604
    I go along with slimjim on the suggestion to get an SGX. I've made mine 'tail-less.' At 6 ft. the SGX doesn't reach my entire prostate but is more agile than the MGX and is great to use during foreplay when I'm physically active.
  • Also thinking about the Helix...actually, leaning towards it. It seems to be quite popular, and I'd like to see how I respond to a differently-shaped massager.
  • priapusonepriapusone
    Posts: 257
    Hmmm, i know....
  • buttfunbuttfun
    Posts: 60
    [QUOTE=rook;47134]I go along with slimjim on the suggestion to get an SGX. I've made mine 'tail-less.' At 6 ft. the SGX doesn't reach my entire prostate but is more agile than the MGX and is great to use during foreplay when I'm physically active.imageI ended up going this route as well, and though I was already able to reach a super-O, I found it much easier this way.
  • stumpy
    Posts: 140
    I'm 5'4" and I never had much success with the MGX, I did Dremel the tail off and found it to be pleasant though. However I purchased the Vice and have had great success, however I don't use the vibe and I hear the progasm is similar in size. For me it seems like it's more filling though, so it seems to make contact with the prostate better. I'm not convinced it's a height ratio thing though as the Vice is longer then the MGX.
  • Since reading many times about men removing handles, I've toyed (pun intended?) with the idea of it with my MGX since I never use it since I have so many of the others. I'm afraid I will ruin it. I'm not technically inclinded, and may not have the right tools to do it correctly. I saw instructions in a forum a long time ago about how to do it. Actually I have offered to give it away to someone who can't afford one, or sell it if someone wanted to pay a little something, but have had no takers. Maybe folks are afraid of the idea of a used one. I've always sterized it after every use, and I myself would not hesitate to use a used one. I think the material is non-porous.
  • legace
    Posts: 128
    just snip it off with wire cutters or even scissors. get some fine sand paper and just sand it smooth.
  • stumpy
    Posts: 140
    Dremel! Mine looks like it was manufactured without the tail.
  • Thank you, Legace. I think even I can do that. That sounds simpler than the explanation I had seen somewhere a lont time ago.
    Paul