Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Google

In this Discussion

OT: Woman giving man Super-O
  • A female user (Zane blue) said something about doing this and I'd like to know how this is possible. I thought the only way was for the man to have them solo with the use of an Aneros.
  • newtoforum;

    I've had Super-Os while having sex with my wife, both during intercourse and BJs. The movement of the Aneros Eupho inside me triggers them. On the way there I get a lot of Dry-Os. Most of the time with her I get Dry-Os for awhile, then ejac and that ends it. For me, using the Aneros with my wife is better even though Super-Os are easier to achieve solo.

    Cheers,

    Dave
  • artformartform
    Posts: 1,484
    Hi newtoforum! re: "Woman giving man Super-O" :D :D Thanks ten_s_nut for your post while I was writing!! :D :D

    YES!!! indeed sir!!! My wife gave me my first and my best Super-Os in the Active Body Super-O category, of which there are many levels and many different phenomena. For the larger SUPER-O SPECTRUM see: http://www.aneros.com/forum/f5/super-o-spectrum-whats-your-point-view-15328/

    She and I have a mutual prostates(G-spots) practice (MPP), as well as many other types of intimate sessions. During MPP, one of our favourite positions is the Wedding Band, both lying on our backs, heads to other's toes, my finger(s) in her vagina at her prostate(G-spot), and hers in my anus/rectum at my prostate(G-spot). Both of us gently floating our fingers very lightly caressing and delicately massaging at times. We sense other in both subdued active-body, and more often still-body Super-Os, as well as forming orgasmic ecstatic energies loops through both our bodies as described and sometimes other connections with each one's free hand, feet, whatever happens!!! Usually 3+ hours of uncountable ecstasies and more... ... ...
    Details in my blog posts: Aneros

    Numbers of men here from couples have posted about their versions of partner induced Super-Os. I have had extraordinary Super-Os of all three categories solo, many with my Eupho!!!

    Aneros are fabulous and I use them regularly for BPH therapy, usually ICE or Vice and sometimes Max, and get great solo Super-Os, before the grand finale, "cleaning the pipes", Super-T ejac super orgasm!!! On the other hand, through still-body dry Super-Os, leading one energetically into the highest states, Aneros devices can be, as BF Mayfield said years ago: "Our Tantric Training Wheels"!!!

    all the best opening to and allowing super orgasms of all kinds and infinite variations solo and partnered all

    artform
  • B MayfieldB Mayfield
    Posts: 2,077
    Newtoforum,

    I believe Zane was referring to pegging at the time. Not to speak for Zane, but I think what she was getting at is that she wants to be with a man who is multi-orgasmic like herself. She wants to be involved with her partner going to that level.

    As I have stated previously IMO in an absolute sense no one "gives" another person a Super-O (or a traditional orgasm for that matter). The idea is that we allow ourselves to be stimulated by another (in various ways) and that this stimulation results in arousal. As sufficient arousal builds, an orgasm becomes possible. This isn't to say that a partner has no involvement in generating an orgasm, it's just that it isn't a simple as one person giving another person something...it's far more complex than that. The misconception is rooted in our ideas about ejaculation. The truth is that ejaculation is so automatic for most men and it can happen so quickly that it's almost like a button being pushed. As a result there is the tendency to see the person who is pushing the button as having given the orgasm.

    The Super-O is far different in this regard. Even when one is adept it often takes the right state of mind, and time to develop. A Super-O is coalesced from subtle sensations that must be focused upon. One is in essence facilitating the response for oneself. That said, there are many people in this forum that have an understanding of the concept that I'm speaking of that still use this reference. Being given an orgasm is, in my mind, almost an idiom at this point. In general I am more at home with the idea of being induced to orgasm by a partner.





    BF Mayfield
  • artformartform
    Posts: 1,484
    Agree completely B Mayfield!! :D :D

    Although, I have to say that I was as surprised as my wife when she lit me up to the full-body, arms and legs flailing, laughing and crying Super-O right out of the blue, after just sliding her finger in me while riding me cowgirl facing me. I exploded!! and she soon dismounted agilely keeping her finger in doing that magic. I do confess my anus was open enough that she could easily go in, as I was hoping she might and I won't deny that I was all tuned to whatever might subtly coalesce and ignite. Yahoo!!! Just the memories can relive it physically...

    artform
  • B MayfieldB Mayfield
    Posts: 2,077
    Artform you are so blessed!

    You're living the life....living the life!


    image

    BF Mayfield
  • [QUOTE=B Mayfield;95832]Newtoforum,

    I believe Zane was referring to pegging at the time. Not to speak for Zane, but I think what she was getting at is that she wants to be with a man who is multi-orgasmic like herself. She wants to be involved with her partner going to that level.

    As I have stated previously IMO in an absolute sense no one "gives" another person a Super-O (or a traditional orgasm for that matter). The idea is that we allow ourselves to be stimulated by another (in various ways) and that this stimulation results in arousal. As sufficient arousal builds, an orgasm becomes possible. This isn't to say that a partner has no involvement in generating an orgasm, it's just that it isn't a simple as one person giving another person something...it's far more complex than that. The misconception is rooted in our ideas about ejaculation. The truth is that ejaculation is so automatic for most men and it can happen so quickly that it's almost like a button being pushed. As a result there is the tendency to see the person who is pushing the button as having given the orgasm.

    The Super-O is far different in this regard. Even when one is adept it often takes the right state of mind, and time to develop. A Super-O is coalesced from subtle sensations that must be focused upon. One is in essence facilitating the response for oneself. That said, there are many people in this forum that have an understanding of the concept that I'm speaking of that still use this reference. Being given an orgasm is, in my mind, almost an idiom at this point. In general I am more at home with the idea of being induced to orgasm by a partner.





    BF Mayfield


    That is what I mean. Being induced to orgasm. Either way the point was when women have gspot orgasms she gets there by relaxing and allowing herself to be open to the sensations and her partner takes her the rest of the way. They are both active (although in different ways) in her goal towards orgasm. Whereas it seems a man has to use a toy and just play with himself. He can't relax, open himself to those sensations and let her take him the rest of the way with her finger or something since prostate massage apparently doesn't produce Super-o's.

    I also read on another forum that women have more secondary sexual areas than men which can be pleased. It sounds like bullshit since I know I am sensitive in most places. But what do you think? It sounds like a stupid myth.
  • [QUOTE=artform;95833]Agree completely B Mayfield!! :D :D

    Although, I have to say that I was as surprised as my wife when she lit me up to the full-body, arms and legs flailing, laughing and crying Super-O right out of the blue, after just sliding her finger in me while riding me cowgirl facing me. I exploded!! and she soon dismounted agilely keeping her finger in doing that magic. I do confess my anus was open enough that she could easily go in, as I was hoping she might and I won't deny that I was all tuned to whatever might subtly coalesce and ignite. Yahoo!!! Just the memories can relive it physically...

    artform

    THANK YOU!!!

    That is all I wanted to know.That I can relax and lie back while a woman does the rest of the job. That it is possible to have Super-o using a woman's finger.
  • [QUOTE=artform;95833]Agree completely B Mayfield!! :D :D

    Although, I have to say that I was as surprised as my wife when she lit me up to the full-body, arms and legs flailing, laughing and crying Super-O right out of the blue, after just sliding her finger in me while riding me cowgirl facing me. I exploded!! and she soon dismounted agilely keeping her finger in doing that magic. I do confess my anus was open enough that she could easily go in, as I was hoping she might and I won't deny that I was all tuned to whatever might subtly coalesce and ignite. Yahoo!!! Just the memories can relive it physically...

    artform

    so agree with B that is so awesome :) I hope to achieve such a relationship in my future one day
  • So going over this again

    It is physically possible to have multiple super orgasms and a super T orgasm at the end with just a womans finger and prostate massage? And there are women out there who do this on a consistent basis and the man and woman have an similar amount of orgasms?
  • PolecatPolecat
    Posts: 56
    "SO GOING OVER THIS AGAIN"???

    Newtoforum,

    You are either a troll or man with a most extreme case of OCD. Whatever the case may be, it's high time that you stopped inflicting yourself upon others.


    Paul
  • artformartform
    Posts: 1,484
    Again newtoforum... you cannot expect or get a guarantee or formula for anything here!! :D :D

    [QUOTE=newtoforum;95983]So going over this again

    It is physically possible to have multiple super orgasms and a super T orgasm at the end with just a womans finger and prostate massage? And there are women out there who do this on a consistent basis and the man and woman have an similar amount of orgasms?

    B Mayfield is quite correct, and as you quoted me above, I completely agree with his perspective that you, the male partner, must be relaxed open and connected/engaged/sharing to enable/allow whatever your personal best potential may be able to express with a partner. You cannot make formulaic demands, carry the emotional misdirection that that entails, or try to enforce some self-willed ego satisfying guarantee of a specific result, period. Full stop.

    Brief personal answers from my unique experiences with mrs. a: First; yes although I feel free to bring my dear old cock into the Super-T finale most, butt not all, of the time... and Second; yes, just reread my description of The Wedding Band position/practice in the post above, and in my blog http://www.aneros.com/displayblog.php?id=3544 , which almost invariably gives that marvellously, exquisitely, spiritually balanced result (with not one thought of numerical scorekeeping please!).

    These things can be found only by connecting, sharing, respecting and mutually celebrating, having explored and found them together. Mutuality is all!!

    all the best loving mutual partnered explorations and celebrations all

    artform
  • my found that inserting my helix turns her on she the sits up to watch me and when she sees i am ready to go off in bliss she lets me go and we are trying cum together i bought her th we vibe