Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Google

In this Discussion

The product I would like to see...
  • I love the Aneros however it does not quite do everything for me. There are times I want to feel the bliss but do it while seated. The Aneros is okay in these circumstances, however I would love to see a product that would be designed with this in mind.

    It would probably have to be made out of a pliable material. The Aneros feels to hard when you sit on it. Also I think the shape and size would have to be altered. It seems to me that sitting puts your prostate in a different position relative to your anus. Also I think one could become very creative while trying to devise a way to relatively firm Perineum massage/external prostate massage.
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    I've also found the Aneros entirely awkward for sitting. I've got a cheap recliner that works in my home overseas, but I'm really missing it now. For me, anyway, sitting any more upright with my Helix is quite difficult, and sitting comfortably with the Eupho seems impossible. I wonder if there should be models of these with bases like the Peridise.
  • PommiePommie
    Posts: 734
    There is an alternative approach. This is to use a device which works externally. It is called a Prostate Cradle, which is aimed at stimulating and massaging the prostate by simply sitting on it. Try visiting the following site : Prostate Cradle Revolutionary External Prostate Massager : Prostate Health : E.D. : Male G-spot

    Pommie
  • calmercalmer
    Posts: 75
    I use my Paridise regularly in a sitting position. I achieve constant pleasure with little or no outward signs of me internal twitching. There is not perineum tab to worry about being forced to deep
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    Yeah, I use my Peridise for sitting too, but wish I could tap into the "larger" sensations of the other devices. In my recliner, my Helix works pretty well, but my Eupho pretty much demands that I be lying down (since I don't do "on my side" very well). I guess I'd like to see a Helix/Peridise hybrid.
  • rookrook
    Posts: 1,604
    I'm not a "sitter" with any of the tools; however, here's an idea that might work for those who are:

    About six months ago someone mentioned removing the abutment tab and stem from either a Helix or a Progasm then firmly attaching a string or cord to the reshaped bottom of the mid-body to help retrieval when they expelled it.

    Had no appeal for me as I like/value the p-tab and sphincter sensations along with the prostate stim.
  • Well, speaking for myself, I find that a "tail-less" Eupho is very comfortable to use while sitting, unless one is on a very hard chair. I use mine when sitting in my office style chair, and is especially comfortable in a recliner or sofa.

    I even like the feel of my tail-less Helix. That tail does nothing to enhance performance, and in some cases actually decreases performance, IMHO.

    Cut it off, smooth off the stump and enjoy.

    C
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    I actually have pairs of a Eupho and a Helix on either side of the Atlantic, so once I pull them altogether someday, I'll try lopping off the tail on one of each of them.
  • HelixerHelixer
    Posts: 566
    IMO the design of the Aneros makes it ideal for prostatemassage but obviously less suited for sitting, why is sitting neccessary?
    In a similar vein I would like to take a shit while keeping the Aneros in, but somehow I just keep shitting it out:confused:

    Life ain't fair :(

    When I want to orgasm while sitting I use the KSMO or I wait to Super O and pffft the Aneros out. Anyway, I prefer lying down(I shake to much in the chair so sometimes even with the KsMO I prefer to lie down later on).

    ----------------------------------

    The product I would really like to see is an Aneros that requires NO LUBE WHATSOEVER!
    Coz the one thing that a healthproduct like the Aneros that could be potentially harmful if not lifethreatening are the side effects of lube.
    Let's face it, no matter what the lube is made of, it's an unnatural direction for anything to go IN your anus, the 'intended' direction is (arguably?) OUT the way.

    I guess we're like labrats at the moment, time will tell, though I for one would be more at ease if Aneros developed something with a certain type of material that didn't require lube.
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    Oh, I go in phases, between preferring to lie or to sit, but sometimes I like to watch videos of lovely ladies. ;-)
  • HelixerHelixer
    Posts: 566
    [QUOTE=Tremelo;90084]Oh, I go in phases, between preferring to lie or to sit, but sometimes I like to watch videos of lovely ladies. ;-)

    sure but do you like sitting with something stuck up your ass?
    Besides the inconvenience I'd call it a kind of 'manual stimulation' but instead of using your hands you're using the chair.Why risk damaging your insides with a piece of plastic stuck up your ass?, to me that's just common sense.
    As I said there are different ways to orgasm and sitting in a chair and watching beautiful women I'd prefer Anerosless or KSMO everytime.
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    Excuse me, Helixer, but there's no reason to get judgemental. I sit as I lie - in a state of relaxation - but I'd prefer comfort over discomfort as well.

    Are you often so snotty? I'd always thought you were a proper bloke before.
  • HelixerHelixer
    Posts: 566
    What's snotty about saying I don't think it's a good idea sitting with an Aneros up your ass?
    All I'm saying if I want to orgasm when I'm sitting I either start of with the KSMO or I first lie with the Aneros and when my engine's started up I shit it out and then sit in the chair and look at beautiful women and cum Anerosless.
    I'd say calling someone snotty for stating common sense is being judgemental....but hey, I'm ONLY trying to help.
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    Well, you basically just assumed I was using my chair with my device in a dangerous way, casually upbraided me as if I had no common sense, and then interjected an air of superiority about your means which are so much better for you (despite not being casually available to everyone). Pardon me, but I read and re-read your post several times, and found myself unable to read it as anything BUT snotty. I don't think I'm the touchy type, but it just seemed really unusually pointed to me.

    Besides which, missing the point that I was requesting a device that *would* be more safe and comfortable, the whole reason I'd spoken up.
  • HelixerHelixer
    Posts: 566
    [QUOTE=Tremelo;90123]Well, you basically just assumed I was using my chair with my device in a dangerous way, casually upbraided me as if I had no common sense, and then interjected an air of superiority about your means which are so much better for you (despite not being casually available to everyone). Pardon me, but I read and re-read your post several times, and found myself unable to read it as anything BUT snotty. I don't think I'm the touchy type, but it just seemed really unusually pointed to me.

    Besides which, missing the point that I was requesting a device that *would* be more safe and comfortable, the whole reason I'd spoken up.

    Geez, if this is what you're like when someone's giving good advice, I daren't even imagine how you would have reacted if I'd been genuinely offensive. Perhaps you should get help? See a psychologist or a psychiatrist? maybe they've got some nicely coloured pills they can give you to rid you from your delusions, oder,....a little shocktreatment maybe?
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    Well, Helixer, I assure you it's been an unusual episode for me, but if you see nothing unusual on your part worth apologizing for, then we'll just drop it. I dunno, it all still reads snotty to me (and seems a tone that comes naturally to you), but if it's all been a complete waste of time to say so, I'll simply move on.
  • HelixerHelixer
    Posts: 566
    [QUOTE=Tremelo;90133]Well, Helixer, I assure you it's been an unusual episode for me, but if you see nothing unusual on your part worth apologizing for, then we'll just drop it. I dunno, it all still reads snotty to me (and seems a tone that comes naturally to you), but if it's all been a complete waste of time to say so, I'll simply move on.

    hmm, first you were shocked at my 'snottyness' coz you thought I was a 'proper bloke' and now that just turns out to be a charade for your antics, anyways....you're completely absurd especially after all the namecalling you've been doing you're still thinking somehow that I ought to, am going to apologize:confused:

    If we're going to have any constructive discussion here I suggest that you refrain from ad hominem remarks and either uphold your suggestion or comment on my suggestion.

    What I was saying was, that if would make more sense IMO for Aneros to develop a type of material that doesn't compromise on the IMO desired properties(hardness, movement, outer prostate/perineum stim.) but that DOESN'T require any lube!!!

    So perhaps next time if you want to ciritcize this, instead of calling me snotty etc, perhaps you could question if there really is a need for a lubeless Aneros, or if there is even a hard material that wouldn't require lube or even question my premisse that hardness is a desired characteristic.

    This is what I (mistakenly?) assumed the discussion would be about, but then again I guess it's not unnusual on internetfora that some ppl, when their ideas get criticized start crying like a little girl and start calling you all the name's under the sun....oh well, it's a funny ol' world!
  • Tremelo
    Posts: 141
    Okay, I see the misunderstanding now. You evidently read my comment #10 as a response to your no lube idea in #9, which I wasn't responding to at all. You wrote #11 as a follow up to your no lube point, as if I was refuting it somehow (which I wasn't), so then much of your comment seemed out of left field to me and quite unexpectedly refutatory. I took umbrage at your common sense point because I didn't see any evidence suggesting I lacked any. I was then (to declare my causal responsibility here) taken so aback that I actually spoke up about it (rare for me), which you then (completely understandably) took legitimate offense at, and so on, and so on.

    Plenty of misunderstanding to go around. Maybe if you re-read it, you'll see it too, and perhaps imagine why I took it so personally. (You did quote and refute me directly, in a tone I think not only myself would find belittling. BUT, you were defending a point, which I was obliviously unaware WAS the point.)

    Look, I don't give a damn about an apology. I just want you to understand what's happened above well enough that we can proceed to peacefully co-exist in these forums.

    And perhaps while you re-read, you'll consider that most of your own ad hominem attacks have very little basis for taking seriously, going forward. I'm not at all whom you're accusing me to be. Please don't trust your assumptions. I.e., emphasis on "please."

    Besides which, DUH! A lubeless Aneros would be FANTASTIC.